Poor

“Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.” Matt 19:21

I’ve had some comments lately that I’m spending too much time on looking backward and not enough time looking forward, so I thought I would spend a little time responding.

First, if you read the title of this blog, it is about a progressive point of view.

In other words, I support what the current administration is doing and want it to succeed. I believe that there is a role for government to play. I believe that success can’t come at the expense of another, in other words it can’t be a zero-sum game. It has to be an expanding-pie game. We individually succeed when we collectively succeed. I also believe that the best economic growth comes when those who have the least gain the most.

The best long-term hope for that sort of transformation for the poor comes from education. As I’ve posted before, a college degree virtually erases any economic disadvantage the parents of that graduate may have experienced. The problem is that a child’s educational success is intimately tied to where they live and the ability of their parents to be involved in their education. When those parents are struggling to keep food on the table and a roof over their heads, they aren’t often able to be as involved as the need to be.

So how does government help?

Since it is not a level playing field for all members of our society, I believe those who have enjoyed success have responsibility to help those who are struggling. Government does this through a tax policy by taxing people according to their ability to pay.

Some people are poor because they were born to poor parents and never had an opportunity to escape. Some are poor because they are physically or mentally challenged and simply can’t support themselves. Some are poor because they have made bad choices, turned to crime, or became addicted to drugs.

Jesus didn’t distinguish. He said that we give to all poor people because they are our brothers. Jesus was a “needs-based” healer. He didn’t ask how you came to be in need. He didn’t withhold his help from those who were in need because of the bad choices they made. He only asked if you were ready to be healed.

So if we follow the Bible, the next question is how do we use the money to help the poor, because they’re ready!

Well the Bible is helpful here too. We have to make sure that they have something to eat, clothes to wear, and a safe place to sleep. We also are obligated to help them escape from poverty by teaching them how to support themselves.

So how does that translate to today?

A lot of the stimulus package is going to the poor and working poor. Hopefully that will translate into the immediate needs of food, clothing, and shelter. Many economists have said that the fastest way to get money into the economy is to give it to poor people because they will spend it. The challenge with the current package is going to be getting into the hands of those who need it fast enough.

We need more jobs and the stimulus package is designed to do that too, though the majority of the construction jobs are short term. The real transformative jobs will come as energy and healthcare reforms kick in. Something as simple as reversing the stem cell research ban is going to spark our economy here in Michigan with high paying research jobs. Those jobs will allow graduates from our top universities to stay in the state, buy homes, and start businesses and families. It’s this sort of progress on a local and regional level that helps us as a country to climb back out of the hole that we have dug for ourselves.

Finally, we need good schools. That was cut out of the stimulus package, but the current administration has that on their agenda as well.

This is a challenging time, but it is also a time a great promise. What I find interesting is the same people who criticize the Obama administration for too little change on the political front, are apoplectic over the sweeping social and economic changes and the pace with which he is implemeting them. In fact, he isn’t making any of this stuff up. He is doing a great job of keeping the promises that he made to those who elected him.

6 Responses to “Poor”

  1. keith says:

    Jeff,
    Might be the best articule you’ve written….I’ll wait a few days to respond out of respect for your excellents.

  2. keith says:

    Jeff,
    This link is an articule I hope you will read. If anything I could possible say regarding any issue to point out to you your side of the aisle is not lilly white, this would be it. Look who defended the bonuses when the bail out money was being given. Look who is now trying to make a public proclumation as to “outrage.” Then finally, look who recieve the most AIG funds at campain time……I’d love to hear your comments regarding Mr. Dodd……He should be out pronto for gross incomtitence. As per HIS languge written into the bail out the AIG employees ARE ENTITLED TO EVERY DIME OF TAX PAYER FUNDED BONUS THEY RECEIVED THIS PAST WEEKEND. THEY ARE LEGALLY ENTITLED TO THIS MONEY, THANK YOU MR DODD……….do you think Obama was clueless on this one? It’s adding up and I really hope you read this article.

    http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/finance/dodd-cracks-aig—time/

  3. keith says:

    Hey Jeff,
    can you comment on this…..Truely, spiritual wickedness in high places.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/18/sen-dodd-admits-adding-bonus-provision-stimulus-package/

    In light of the entire mess the bail outs are causing, and the total ineptness the gov’t is showing in doing anything correctly in this situation, are you sure you want MORE involvement from them?

  4. keith says:

    I made two tries to post and they are being blocked, i guess…..

    please share your views on senator dodd…..the #1 recepient of campain cash from AIG…..bearly beat Obama….and the last min langue that got into the stimulus bill that PROTECTED the bonus’s was from who again. Let me help, on tues dodd had no idea, wed he did it, today then admin MADE him do it……

    i’m not against the bonus’s. they had LEGAL agreements. If they are taken away then our country is closer to falling into ruin then I thought. they have contract the the gov’t even when one step further and wrote into a bill for crying out loud.

    this is proof gov’t needs to stay OUT of running companies and tell people how much they can and cant make… we’re becoming a thrid world gov’t if we continue on this path.

  5. Jeff Beamsley says:

    If you post a link in a reply it throws it into a pending bin that I have to approve. The problem was that there have been server problems and so I couldn’t login to approve. Should be OK now.

    As far as the bonus flap, I just don’t know enough yet to have an opinion. I’m inclined to believe the AIG CEO who said that they were legally obligated. I also agree with you that we should not pass laws to reach back into the pockets of those ho received bonuses and take the money back.

    I think the whole thing is a red herring anyway. It is intended to take away an issue that the Republicans could use to blunt any futher stimulus funding. In other words an ugly example of bi-partisanship.

Leave a Reply