Just last weekend I went with some friends to go and see the most recent Will Smith movie, Hancock. Before seeing the movie I had managed to stumble on the actual first edition of the screenplay (formerly titled, “Tonight He Comes”. please hold your laughter to a minimum), and from what I had read, it seemed that Hancock would have been a much better film if it would had stuck closer to the original screenplay.

Well, for starters, in case you don’t know, Hancock tells the story of a super hero that isn’t exactly all that super, or heroic for that matter. Will Smith plays Hancock (obviously), an alchoholic, homeless guy who possesses almost all of the same traits as Super Man, with the exception of having the same “heroic convictions”. Along the way Hancock meets a Public Relations manager (Jason Bateman), who tries to help Hancock acquire a more noble image amongst the city people. Also starring is Charlize Theron who plays Bateman’s wife.
As far as the acting goes, it isn’t amazing, nor is it bad. I would classify it just above average. Smith certainly does a good job as Hancock, and the rest of the cast is decent as well. With that being said however, the acting portraying Hancock’s villains are generic at best. More on this in a minute.
The first half of Hancock, in my opinion, was pretty good. It had enough humor in it to keep me entertained, while at the same time it seemed to flesh out personalities of its main characters. However, somewhere around the half way point, the entire film started to lose a lot of its “humorous feel”, and started to become a serious film. Now I understand why the film did this, but it really seems to put the entire film into a caddywhompus of sorts. The rest of the movie at this point really becomes bogged down by an underlined overtone of redemption, as well as trying to give the viewer a half arsed attempt at some sort of backstory for Hancock.
I guess maybe that’s my biggest problem with Hancock. It’s simply the fact that their really isn’t enough information to go on when a completely new super hero with no forehand knowledge is introduced. I really love the original idea of Hancock being a complete a-hole, and the idea of what it would be like to be a modern day super hero. Unfortunately, halfway through the film
Hancock really turns out to be nothing more than an average, cookie cutter character. I really would have like to seen this movie kept with the original idea of Hancock being a jerk throughout the whole film. I think it really would have been a fresh outlook on the superhero genre as a whole.
Another thing that this film seriously lacks is a real villain. The (main) villains throughout the movie are really nothing more than thugs with guns. Yeah I know, the main battle is suppose to be about Hancock overcoming his own personal demons, but that still doesn’t excuse the complete lack of creativity concerning the bad guys. I mean just think about it. A super hero is really only as good as his villains. Batman has Joker. Super Man has Lex Luthor. Spider-Man has Green Goblin. Who does Hancock have? Three (clumsy) guys with guns, that remind me of the burglars from Home Alone? Pleaaaase.
Overall, Hancock is your basic summer popcorn movie at its best. It’s loud, fast moving, has humorous moments here and there, and special effects up the butt. Unfortunately though, as a result of the complete lack of decent villains, a pretty lame character back story, the fact that the movie takes itself to serious by the end of the film, and Hollywood’s complete bastardization of an original screenplay, keeps Hancock from being anything other than “ordinary”.
6.5/ 10