<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bedford Watch still up to their antics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogsmonroe.com/toughtalk/2009/04/bedford-watch-still-up-to-their-antics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogsmonroe.com/toughtalk/2009/04/bedford-watch-still-up-to-their-antics/</link>
	<description>Taking on the issues affecting Bedford Township - from Government Center to the Community Stadium - no topic is safe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 17:15:12 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kgodfrey</title>
		<link>http://www.blogsmonroe.com/toughtalk/2009/04/bedford-watch-still-up-to-their-antics/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>kgodfrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 12:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogsmonroe.com/toughtalk/?p=79#comment-84</guid>
		<description>First of all John does not write, manage, or have any creative control over this blog. So not really sure where that comes from - it is clearly marked throughout these pages who the author is. 

In terms of factual proof that a Wal Mart will be developed in 2009 should not and does not lie in a judicial decision from 2 years ago when the chief developer was known to be Wal Mart. Absolutely Wal Mart would be named several times in that decision. However, this is 2009 and the rezoning is different than the rezoning requested in the decision named above. Nevermind that there is still no factual evidence or proof that this time around Wal Mart is on the table. 

People seem to forget that Wal Mart could come on to Jon Whitman&#039;s property as it sits today. This rezoning wouldn&#039;t effect that capability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all John does not write, manage, or have any creative control over this blog. So not really sure where that comes from &#8211; it is clearly marked throughout these pages who the author is. </p>
<p>In terms of factual proof that a Wal Mart will be developed in 2009 should not and does not lie in a judicial decision from 2 years ago when the chief developer was known to be Wal Mart. Absolutely Wal Mart would be named several times in that decision. However, this is 2009 and the rezoning is different than the rezoning requested in the decision named above. Nevermind that there is still no factual evidence or proof that this time around Wal Mart is on the table. </p>
<p>People seem to forget that Wal Mart could come on to Jon Whitman&#8217;s property as it sits today. This rezoning wouldn&#8217;t effect that capability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John owns this blog</title>
		<link>http://www.blogsmonroe.com/toughtalk/2009/04/bedford-watch-still-up-to-their-antics/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>John owns this blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 10:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogsmonroe.com/toughtalk/?p=79#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Hey John  - We know who you are...

For you to write statements like there is &quot;no factual proof that if this land is rezoned that a Wal-Mart is going to be developed and placed on that land right now&quot; is just unbelievable... 

Wal Mart is mentioned at least 43 times in the 44-page decision that Bedford Township won in 2007.

Read it for yourself:  copy this link:

http://www.bedfordwatch.com/uploads/Judge_Costello_Whitman_Ford_decision.doc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John  &#8211; We know who you are&#8230;</p>
<p>For you to write statements like there is &#8220;no factual proof that if this land is rezoned that a Wal-Mart is going to be developed and placed on that land right now&#8221; is just unbelievable&#8230; </p>
<p>Wal Mart is mentioned at least 43 times in the 44-page decision that Bedford Township won in 2007.</p>
<p>Read it for yourself:  copy this link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bedfordwatch.com/uploads/Judge_Costello_Whitman_Ford_decision.doc" rel="nofollow">http://www.bedfordwatch.com/uploads/Judge_Costello_Whitman_Ford_decision.doc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
