Archive for the ‘Green Products’ Category

China and U.S. Partnership for Clean Energy Research

Monday, August 24th, 2009

Right after I read about Baoding China being the first city to go really green in China, I also found this article about the U.S. and China partnering for clean energy research. The article on ABC New’s website stated this effort is a compromise between the two governments that disagree on whether China should join wealthier nations in cutting its greenhouse gas emissions.
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/WireStory?id=8085845&page=1.

According to the article: “With initial financing of $15 million and headquarters in both countries, the center will focus on coal and clean buildings and vehicles, said U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu. It highlights potential U.S.-Chinese cooperation in an industry that Washington says could create thousands of jobs.” It certainly garnered thousands of jobs for Baoding China.

Oddly, I happened to catch the Emmy nominated interview between Fareed Zakaria of CNN and China’s Premier Wen Jiabao on Sunday about the same time. Wen offered insight as to why China does not respond to the rest of the world’s assertion that they are a super power and should be more proactive and involved politically around the world. Wen said China is not a super power by any means. He said although China is moving fast with their economy and social reform, there are far more rural areas that are below par compared to China’s major cities.

And while we see China as communist, Wen seemed to describe China as more socialist/capitalist—think Hong Kong here. Fareed asked if Wen thought socialism could support a free market system? Wen explained there are visible workings of a free market and the invisible. The best scenario is a balanced free market through guidance and regulation by government. Wen sighted the book A Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith as an ideal. It is considered the first modern work of economics and Smith is considered to be the father of modern economics. A central belief of Smith is that labor is the measure of a nation’s wealth not it’s stores of gold and silver. Sound’s like China.

Both countries are hoping to avoid trade barriers by working together. The article stated: “China is promoting solar, wind and hydroelectric power to reduce reliance on imported oil and gas, which its communist leaders see as a strategic weakness. But Beijing has rejected binding emissions commitments, saying it is the responsibility of rich countries to cut their own output.” Again, they do not view themselves as a super power.

The whole time Wen was talking so candidly about the future, he made sense, and actually seemed charming. China will certainly be promoting a much greener economy since this interview took place before the breaking story about Baoding China’s resourceful turnaround from an auto and manufacturing center to a major supplier of solar and green tech products. This puts China is a position ahead of us already, super power or not. We’re still haggling over whether a turnaround away from polluting industry to a green driven economy will work, while China did it and knows that it not only works, but is also high profitable. It creates those better than gold jobs.

However, as smart and innocent as Wen appeared to be in the interview, and as I found myself agreeing with him on certain assertions about trade, and labor, the mantra going on in my mind was Tibet, Tibet, Tibet. Look what China did and continues to do to those innocent and wonderful people and the pristine land they maintained for centuries high in the Himalayas. China will surely pollute that area too. Fareed addressed Tibetan issues in this interview also and the answer was still pretty hard-line. On top of Tibet, what about China’s attempts to march on Taiwan as it has so many times before?

The interview is a good look at how China thinks. Fareed began the interview with Wen by asking how the Chinese feel about the state of the U.S. economy considering we owe China so much money. It was the million-dollar question over a possible default in payment if things don’t recover quickly here. Wen assured that China has confidence the U.S. will return to prosperity. It wants to help the U.S meet that goal. It looks as if this partnership for clean energy research might just be China’s way of pushing us to that prosperity—for China’s own sake. Make no mistake, China is out for number one always.

Watch some of the interview even though it is not about the environment per se, it is a good snapshot of China, a country we will soon partner with for clean energy research.

House Climate Bill Meets Senate Committee Bill

Friday, July 31st, 2009

Although most of the media centered on the House Climate Bill recently, this past June the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee approved a comprehensive energy package S 1462 that is pretty much the same ole, same ole conservative twist on energy. S 1462 includes:

· Clean Energy Deployment Administration – provides for increased capitalization of clean energy projects;
· Oil and gas – opens portions of the Eastern Gulf of Mexico, including Destin Dome, to oil and gas leasing, and establishes a one-stop permitting office in Alaska for offshore leasing in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas;
· Alaska natural gas pipeline – increases federal loan guarantee for the developers of a gas pipeline project from $18 billion to $30 billion, and allows access to the Federal Financing Bank;
· Energy workforce development – provides assistance to institutions of higher learning and community colleges that place an emphasis on energy jobs and help train the energy workers of the future;
· Energy efficiency – establishes new efficiency standards for several consumer products and makes changes that will allow standards to be updated more often and be market driven;
· Renewable electricity standard – requires utilities to generate 15 percent of their electricity with renewable energy by 2021, and contains consumer off-ramps for increased costs and the opportunity to petition for a variance due to transmission constraints, includes expanded definition of biomass, eligible hydropower and removes nuclear uprates from the baseline;
· Nuclear – provides clear statement of the federal government’s support for nuclear energy, as well as encourages resolution of the spent nuclear fuel issue.
· Transmission – addresses planning and siting of electrical transmission infrastructure by encouraging states to develop plans and giving FERC backstop siting authority, ties cost allocation to benefits;
· Cyber security – increases authority for both FERC and the Department of Energy to protect the nation’s electrical grid from cyber security threats and vulnerabilities;
· Carbon sequestration – allows for indemnification of up to 10 demonstration projects;
· Modification of Section 526 – allows the government, and in particularly the military, to purchase Canadian tar sand oil.

Either the two bills will collide, and end up being much ado about nothing, or meld into a bill everyone can work with notwithstanding industry lobbyists who would like all to remain status quo even though the math doesn’t add up. We use a quarter of the world’s oil, and only have 3% of the world’s oil stores. When we get into tar sand oil, the price of producing the stuff and the pollution it produces is ridiculous to even bring up in an environmental conversation. We need to move along to sustainable, renewable energy and soon.

The idea is to use as little as necessary of the old fossil fuels in the interim process of the shift to alternatives while we concentrate on funding technology that has been squeeze played for quite awhile. And what are some of the technologies that have been held up? It’s been over a year since I blogged about Centia, a process that uses restaurant sludge grease and converts it to jet fuel and other fuels at the molecular level. http://www.oilgae.com/blog/2009/01/jet-fuel-from-animal-fats-algae-oil-via.html. This fuel can be ready to go in less than 2 years if it gets proper funding. See what I mean? What’s the stall? There is a never-ending supply of restaurant grease the way America likes to eat. And what about algae for fuel? I blogged about that too. Some mighty fine progress is being made along those lines, http://earth2tech.com/2008/03/27/15-algae-startups-bringing-pond-scum-to-fuel-tanks/, but again its overlooked in the media and subject to conservative spin that it costs too much or will cost jobs. I’ve even run across someone wondering where we’re going to grow all the algae? Duh–pond scum, some of that stuff can regenerate in 24 hours in the right bog.

I thought we knew by now that anything brand new costs more. Look at mainframe computers back in the 70’s compared to laptops, or digital watches, or radios. We can buy a digital watch or radio in the dollar store now. I bought a dollar store radio for my sister in a nursing home. I couldn’t believe the sound I got out that little plastic thing when I put the earphones on. Unbelievable.

The ingenuity of invention that transpires when something is finally unleashed from the grasp of the status quo is unbelievable and could put the U.S. in a position of industrial leadership again. And that’s how I and many others picture the future. Superceding fossil fuels isn’t a downfall, but an opportunity. We’ll be saying the word, “unbelievable” about a lot of things we invent like running our cars, and heating our homes with restaurant grease or algae, or solar, or wind. Alternative energy is a diverse and growing market. If anything our environment will be a lot quieter.

Read more about both bills:

http://energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=IssueItems.View&IssueItem_ID=1fbce5ed-7447-42ff-9dc2-5b785a98ad80.

http://www.pewclimate.org/acesa

http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/18405

http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/06/17/17greenwire-senate-committee-approves-broad-energy-package-9861.html

http://www.grist.org/article/broad-and-diverse-support-for-waxman-markeys-american-clean-energy-and-secu.

http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/06/17/17greenwire-senate-committee-approves-broad-energy-package-9861.html

Australia Takes Lead in Banning Bottled Water

Monday, July 13th, 2009

A New York Times article reported that residents of Bundanoon, Australia voted to ban bottled water sales in their town to do their part in helping environmental concerns over landfills and save a little cash too. Only two people voted against the measure.

Bundanoon may very well be a small community of only 2500, but it wasn’t the first in Australia to restrict bottled water. Earlier the same day, the premier of New South Wales “banned all state departments and agencies from buying bottled water, calling it a waste of money and natural resources.” New South Wales is Australia’s most populous state.

Approximately 60 cities in the U.S. and some in Canada and the U.K. stopped spending tax dollars on bottled water during meetings and conferences, but Australia is the first to ban actual sales of bottled water products. Bundanoon was prompted to this latest move because a bottled water company out of Sydney wanted to set up operations in their small town. The idea of using Bundanoon’s water resources, trucking it out of town, and then reselling the finished product back to Bundanoon’s residents is nuts. They are still in a court battle over it and evidently won’t be having any of the finished product around at all now.

It’s curious that just 30 years ago no one had an interest is consuming so much water. You drank the stuff when you were thirsty. What I noticed happening back then were diet plans that required massive amounts of water to move fat out of the body, i.e. Atkins original diet. This may have jump-started the bottled water industry, along with concerns over polluted water in the 70’s that lead to the Clean Air and Water Acts. Although Perrier water was around, the first two massively produced brands worldwide that I recall were Aquafina—produced by Pepsi Cola, and Dasani—produced by Coca Cola. Coke and Pepsi admitted their bottled water is nothing more than tap water. So why are we paying for it? And I’d like to know, did the diet gurus, and the aerobics industry that took off about the same time have a big stake in the bottled water industry?

After writing blogs about bottled water, a pet peeve, I found that Pepsi and Coke didn’t want a bottle return policy for their respective water either because it would be too costly. What? They have a commodity that is could conceivably come out of hose into a bottle that we are routinely charged anywhere from $.79 to $1.25 for and they can’t afford a bottle return?

And although we’re still struggling with an overabundance of plastic containers, new products arrive in the market place on a regular basis that use even more plastic than necessary like the new Steamables line of foods where we just leave the food in the bag and steam them in the microwave, serve it up, and throw the plastic bag in the trash on a daily basis. The same goes for tossing a perfectly good zip loc bag after using it once. Our packaging needs to change, along with our attitude that “out of sight” means all is well.

Maybe if we were required to keep our garbage within sight, like in our own yards, we’d be way more ingenious at figuring out how to keep from producing a lot of it and in a big hurry to figure out how to get rid of it. Necessity is the mother of invention.

Read more: http://alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/SP466190.htm.

http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/27/news/companies/pepsi_coke/.

Microsoft Hohm vs. Google PowerMeter for Montoring Home Energy Use

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

Microsoft recently launched a free online home energy-monitoring tool that aims to help homeowners realize and effectively reduce their consumption of energy. By inputting specifics and utilizing online feedback by homeowners, suggestions are given for curtailing energy consumption home to home.

Microsoft Hohm came about in response to Google’s partnership with utility companies in 6 states, Canada, and India for what was termed “smart meter” software that does the same in home energy monitoring. The article on Physorg.com stated: “The Google PowerMeter can tell residents which devices or appliances in their homes are being electricity hogs and which are being frugal with energy. The software program receives information from smart meters and sends a detailed report to a home computer on how the power is being divvied up.”

Microsoft is doing likewise and “partnering with four West Coast utility companies on Microsoft Hohm: Puget Sound Energy, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Seattle City Light and Xcel Energy.” Soon customers for these utility companies will be able to automatically upload their energy usage data into the Microsoft Hohm application where it goes to work offering suggestions on lowering usage. It won’t be long until all utility companies are enlisted to do the same across America and more and more software applications are created to help Americans find where they can save on energy.

Read more: http://www.physorg.com/news165084939.html.

It said consumers who are customers of a Microsoft Hohm utility partner company will be able “in the near future” to automatically upload their energy usage data into the application.

The Lazy Environmentalist

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

 

 

Josh Dorfman’s program the “Lazy Environmentalist,” on the Sundance Channel takes on environmental skeptics, “experts in fields as diverse as food, architecture and business — to prove that there are innovative, cost-effective, ecologically sound alternatives that also meet high professional standards.” If you don’t get the Sundance Channel, or haven’t caught episodes of “The Lazy Environmentalist,” then check out Dorfman’s website: http://www.sundancechannel.com/lazy/ you can catch up. where

 

Josh promotes using the least amount of effort for the greatest gain in going green. Tune in and find out some fairly easy ways to help the environment. Josh seems to ferret out skeptics from every walk of life and shows them how they, as well as, the rest of us adversely impact the environment and how easy it is to change a few things. Most people are shocked at how much trash they produce. Eliminating one carbon footprint at a time may be the way to get people moving. It doesn’t take a whole lotta effort.

 

I don’t know about anyone but I realized a long time ago that continuous small, even baby steps forward are better than nothing at all. In time, those small steps amount to big results. And most of the time along the way, innovation takes place where any one of us is capable of inventing the next big green product. No one else can take the steps for us. We have to start somewhere and just like an exercise program the least amount of effort for the greatest gain is the best way to start.

 

One Good Sunny Day Leads to Solar Fountain Search

Thursday, April 23rd, 2009

We’ve finally had a nice sunny day during Earth celebration week and I’ve been rummaging around to find things to make my own outdoor solar fountain. Solar power items have improved and proliferated in the past couple of years. I’ve found quite a few websites that sell some really nice solar fountains. One website is running big sales and free shipping—a good deal. http://www.gardenfountainoutlet.com/?gclid=CIvx_OXyh5oCFR7yDAodFGShGQ

I like the solar fountain I already have and besides being environmental, they are so easy. However, there are pros and cons to solar fountains that prospective buyers need to consider.

1. They only run during the day when the sun is out.
2. The water pressure is inconsistent relative to the sun.
3. If the solar panel is separate from the fountain, the fountain can be in the shade.
If the solar panel is integrated into the fountain, the fountain must be in the sun.
4. The solar pump should be brought in during the winter.
5. The solar fountain can be placed anywhere because they do not need electricity.
6. They are carefree during the day, starting and stopping automatically.
7. Solar fountains do not add to the utility bill.

Solar fountains suite me because quite frankly the mosquitoes are horrible after dark so I’m seldom outside. Besides I’m putting my fountain near my front porch as a focal point. When I started looking my attitude was not so fussy. I was just going to buy the whole kit that includes the actual fountain, pump, tubing, and solar panel like my other one. But as I looked, my artistic side surfaced and I started to get real fussy about size, shape, and I want it to be contemporary. When I hit on a website with all types and sizes of solar pumps, it was a point of no return. I will make my own fountain. I’m planning a “search and find” trip for some urns now.

I’m not going into detail how to make an outdoor fountain because these websites do a pretty good job: http://www.ehow.com/search.aspx?s=Outdoor%20Fountains

http://ezinearticles.com/?Buying-or-Building-Your-Own-Water-Fountain&id=89262

Since I already have one solar fountain, I know the mechanics of how to put one together and this was a good website for pumps: http://www.solarkey.com/product_list.asp?classtype=0202

And while I searched I found another good website for solar powered floodlights that I might add to highlight my new fountain at night. This site also sells solar fountain kits, as well as, solar pumps.
www.thefind.com/search?query=solar+powered+flood+light

All in all, I found a lot more solar fountains than were available just a couple of years ago and more websites with solar everything. When I get my solar fountain together, which might not be too soon, I’ll blog a picture of the finished product.

Labor Unions Celebrate Earth Week

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

The Apollo Alliance, a coalition of labor, business, environmental, and community leaders are working to jump-start a clean energy revolution. They know that it will produce millions of jobs and help the economy. Apollo Alliance claims the Apollo Space program as its inspiration to “promote investments in energy efficiency, clean power, mass transit, next-generation vehicles, and emerging technology, as well as in education and training. Working together, we will reduce carbon emissions and oil imports, spur domestic job growth, and position America to thrive in the 21st century economy.”

That’s a real “we can” attitude. Among Apollo Alliance’s partners “focused on generating green collar jobs” are the nation’s union halls. The union program is called Earth Week in the Union Halls. It launched Saturday, April 18th with the goal of creating support from unions on a national level for clean energy investments and green collar job training.

The weeklong event of the participating 70 union halls nationwide will host the movie “The Greening of Southie” that I blogged about recently with video of the trailer. The DVD documents the trials of renovating an old Boston building into a green Boston building by union construction crews.

The Apollo Alliance website has quite a long article titled “How to Find a Green Job” that states:

The New Apollo Program is a comprehensive economic investment strategy to build America’s 21st century clean energy economy and dramatically cut energy bills for families and businesses. It will generate and invest $500 billion over the next ten years and create more than five million high quality green-collar jobs. It will accelerate the development of the nation’s vast clean energy resources and move us toward energy security, climate stability, and economic prosperity. And it will transform America into the global leader of the new green economy.

I’m impressed. And I know there are at least two big-time alliances like Apollo working toward the same goal. The article goes on to say that Americans are at a crossroads. Do we keep going with our outdated fossil fuel ideas that will ultimately come to an end some time in the future while putting us at greater and greater risk for severe climate conditions, or do we seize this time as an opportunity for change for the better. We will be healthier as a result of the earth becoming a healthier place. It’s really up to us.

We’re not doing so well now anyway. People are looking for new jobs and are willing to relocate. Many have little to nothing left because of the economic crunch while others have been victims of devastation from increasingly violent weather conditions already. Still others are looking ahead for their children’s health and well-being. What better time to change? And that’s what America decided in the last election. We just need to move forward and keep moving forward—no looking back.

The Apollo article and website might be helpful for many. There is much more to read at:

http://www.apolloalliance.org/index.php?s=ervin

Build Your Own Wind Turbine

Tuesday, March 17th, 2009

I was watching Planet Green’s “Renovation Nation” and one couple ordered a wind turbine kit delivered to their home. Mind you it looked to be 20 ft tall once it was up. The 3 blades looked different also. They were curved, resembling a quarter moon shape. It was delivered in parts on a flatbed. You assemble it then lift it via cable attached to the flatbed somehow. The owner said he only had to move 10 ft. and the turbine popped right up. Wind generators are measured by rotation speed and typical rotation speeds are 5-20 rpm. His was operating at 10 rpm but 12 rpm was optimal. This particular turbine could supply 100% of the home’s power. That’s quite a step up from turbines of the past. The only major drawback, it cost $10,000 dollars.

Well I wanted to see just what was out there now in wind turbine sales and ran across a build-it-yourself website complete with videos, what parts you will need, what tools, etc. You’ve got to see this for yourself. All I’ve got to say is that there are some pretty enterprising people out there.

http://www.thekevdog.com/projects/wind_generator/

Dow Developing Solar Shingles in Michigan Plant

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

 

 

I saw pictures of solar shingles in Time Magazine over a year ago now. Companies have been working on this technology all along. And Dow is no newcomer. Michigan’s Saginaw Plant is looking to mass-produce solar shingles by 2011. It will mean plenty of money and jobs for that area of Michigan.

 

According to MLive’s website, Dow’s 1900 acre complex, a $50 million investment called Dow Solar Solutions is using thin film photovoltaic technology to integrate solar cells with shingles and begin selling their product with their partners to include “home builders Lennar Corp. of Miami, Pulte Homes Inc. of Bloomfield Hills and Jefferson City, Mo.-based Prost Builders Inc., and Global Solar Energy, a maker of flexible materials.”

 

The solar power business is growing fast—35% annually for a decade. Government incentives are driving it even more quickly. And Robert J. Cleereman, senior director of solar development for Dow said: “I can see utility companies paying for the roofing for customers. It would save them money on building power plants because the solar shingles can act like individual little power plants.”  Suuuuuuuurrrrre. I can’t quite see that. Paying us for the energy we produce for who? We won’t need to buy energy because we’re producing it. It’s the opposite for energy companies I would say. They stand to lose a customer every time someone replaces regular shingles with solar. And who could blame us for doing that? It would be a welcome relief from the high electric and heating bills we’re suffering through this winter even though Palin is still pushing natural gas from Alaska as the way to go. But most of us are using natural gas this winter aren’t we? It hasn’t been cheap to me. There are no guarantees anything will be less expensive as long as a conglomerate, foreign or not, controls the supply side of the equation. 

 

Still it may seem incredible to some that we are finally moving this quickly. What we need to remember is that the unavailability of energy saving products isn’t due to their non existence, or lack of technology for their existence but a former administration hell-bent on holding back technology that didn’t include some sort of fossil fuel, especially oil.

 

Read more: http://www.mlive.com/business/mid-michigan/index.ssf/2009/02/dow_chemical_to_produce_thermo.html

 

 

2008 the Year of Natural Disasters

Thursday, January 1st, 2009

 

Last year was one of the worst years on record for climate related natural disasters according to (ENS) Environmental News Service. Costs associated with damage were 200 billion dollars and thousands of lives as well.

We’re into a new year with a new president. The ENS article stated: “At the annual UN climate conference set for Copenhagen in December 2009, governments are expected to agree on a treaty to limit climate warming greenhouse gas emissions to follow the Kyoto Protocol which expires in 2012.”

Hopefully, the U.S. will see its way to joining the rest of the world in a combined effort toward climate neutrality, which is “living in a way which produces no net greenhouse gas emissions, achievable by reducing emissions, and using carbon offsets to neutralize the remaining emissions.”

 

We CAN do this.

 

Read the whole article: http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/dec2008/2008-12-31-03.asp