Archive for the ‘Refineries’ Category

Environmental Laws Lifted; BP to Dump More into Lake Michigan

Wednesday, August 1st, 2007

BP has been allowed to dump an average of 1,584 pounds of ammonia and 4,925 pounds of sludge into Lake Michigan every day.  With only 35 miles of coastline on Lake Michigan, Indiana is the state that made this decision The additional sludge is the maximum allowed under federal guidelines. Anyone think these guidelines are a joke, especially in light of the Great Lakes Legacy Act? It just shows how incompetent the Bush Administration is when the right hand consistently issues contradictions to what it created with its left hand.

Indiana exempted its state environmental pollution laws for a 3.8 billion dollar expansion of its facilities for CANADIAN oil! And you know what the icebreaker was for this decision?–the creation of 80 new jobs. 80 lousy jobs may in the future deny how many thousands of people fresh drinking water? We are playing with fire here. No one seems to understand that without an environment that provides clean land, air, and water jobs will be of no concern. We will perish!

BP is already one of the largest polluters along the Great lakes. Now that it plans to release 54% more ammonia and 35% more sludge into Lake Michigan everyday those that live along the shoreline will see much more algae blooming; the stuff that gets caught up in props, hogs all the oxygen and kills fish. We’re going around dredging to take pollution out through the Great Lakes Legacy Act and BP is outdoing those efforts at what ratio? This is a practice in futility if I ever saw one.

This just goes to show oil companies, even BP, who is supposedly investing millions for alternative energy sources, speak with forked tongues. Since they have $3.8 billion to invest then surely they can come up with a billion or two to truck the sludge and ammonia to the interior of Canada and dump it in the miles of uninhabited forest land. Oh that’s right, we might ruin one of their wildlife habitats.

Read more about this travesty of justice for our world:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-pollute_15jul15,1,647384.story?ctrack=1&cset=true.

BOYCOTT BP and INDIANA. With only 35 miles of shoreline, blighted by the BP refinery, and now this, Indiana shouldn’t have any say so for anything to do with the Great Lakes any longer.

E-mail Mitch, the governor of Indiana and tell him what you think about this at:

http://www.in.gov/gov/2310.htm.

Sign the petition from Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois to save the lake and watch the press conference about this injustice: http://durbin.senate.gov/SaveOurLakePetition.pdf.

Contact BP and tell them what you think about them. Hey, they want you to,  and are set up to receive your thoughts at: http://www.bp.com/genericformsdisplay.do?formId=7050066.

Global Warming, the Supreme Court, and the EPA

Wednesday, November 29th, 2006

Today is the first time a global warming case has reached the Supreme Court. They will begin hearings based on testimony of 12 states that are asking the court to force the U.S. government to order its environmental agencies to control CO2 emissions from vehicles under the Clean Air Act.  Michigan is among 8 of the 12 states that support the EPA.


But do we really trust the EPA? It was originally established to be independent of government, focusing on public health and its relation to the environment. We all know any business or agency’s ethics and motives are only as good as the people governing them. Also, there are other governmental agencies that have an impact on the EPA. The White House Council for Environmental Quality, formerly headed by Phillip A. Cooney is one of them. Cooney was caught editing important data from scientific reports for quite awhile as well as pressuring the EPA to go along, so much so, that in 2002 the EPA removed an entire section on global warming from its annual report about air pollution. In 2003 it published an extensive report of the environment with no information whatsoever about global warming. Cooney came to his position at the council as a lawyer and former lobbyist  for the American Petroleum Institute.  He has no scientific background to make any alterations of scientific data. You might say throw the bum out, but he has already left the position and now works for Exxon Mobil.


James Hansen, a climatology expert from a NASA Space Study, was pressured by his superiors after giving a presentation about human related climate change. He was told it was still an uncertain topic by his administrator. He reported that in 30 years he never witnessed as much White House involvement and filtering of information from science to the public.


The State Department pressured an international panel of representatives known as the Artic Council to alter their report on global warming. The final draft withheld recommendations for policy to reduce green house gas emissions in order to stop its horrible impact on the Artic. The State Department was also successful in ousting Dr. Robert Watson who chaired the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) since 1996. During his time the IPCC produced a report that predicted an increase of 2.5 to 10.5 F in avg. global warming by 2100 with new evidence it was due to human activities. Exxon Mobil opposed the proposed regulation of CO2 and wanted Watson out. The State Department complied. Dr. Watson lost the support of the U.S. and his position as chair.


The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service developed a brochure on ways to curb agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. They managed to send the first printing but the White House’s Council of Environmental Quality objected to it and a reprint was canceled. 


As I stated in a previous blog, many Americans are wondering how our environment got so bad, so fast. Well this White House accomplished what they set out to do. Appointments to key environmental positions throughout the administration were filled by people that were once employed by the tobacco industry, and are now busom buddies with the petroleum industry. By altering scientific facts, they’ve attempted and succeeded in concealing from and confusing the public about the ever-increasing effects of global warming due to CO2 emissions. The biggest culprits of CO2 emissions are jet airliners, automobiles, refineries and coal burning facilities.  I watched a CBC segment by The Fifth Estate called “The Denial Machine.”  Phil Klapp cornered Jeffrey Holmstead, EPA Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation about altering scientific documents. Klapp had in his hand documents with visible alterations. As he read the changes, it was clearly understood they were meant to dilute the message of the reports. We weren’t just duped about the war folks. We’ve been lied to about the state of our world. And now the race is on to clean it up. It can be done and hopefully the U.S. will emerge as a model in that endeavor. It will take each and every one of us to do our part.  

We’re in this together

Friday, November 24th, 2006

     There are all types of casualties we endure on a daily basis especially during times of war. Losing someone or something precious can happen moment to moment. And although our lives are upset to the point we don’t think we’ll recover, we do. I just wonder how many people realize the biggest casualty of all is happening in small increments every day that none of us will recover from if we don’t turn it around.

Our environment is taking hit after hit, and many of us still do not know that when it’s stated we have 10 years to do something, it does not mean we have ten years before we start doing something. It means if we do not start today toward reversing global warming by controlling our pollution it will be irreversible within 10 years. It’s a good idea to control pollution to begin with. By all the water bottles I see these days, I realize that everyone does get the idea that maybe our water isn’t all that clean, and probably our air.  What I also see by those same water bottles is that we really aren’t getting it at all. Where do you think those plastic bottles go? If your community recycles that’s great. If you recycle on your own, then bless you, but unfortunately only 70% of all our garbage is recycled. Those bottles end up in landfills of which there are approximately 6000 in the U.S.  Plastic takes around 500 years to decompose. Do we love our children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren? Then what are we doing?

The intent of this news blog is to be in your face about our world because we’re all in this together, and if you or my other neighbors don’t jump in and help, the experience of living won’t be what we once knew. Right now it is what it is “An Inconvenient Truth” as Al Gore aptly named it. Many of our little conveniences in life may have to be abandoned to save our earth, save ourselves. It’s a rude awakening, but the sooner we snap out of it, the sooner we turn it around. No more burying our heads in the sand or waiting for “they or them” to do something. They or them is us, all of us.

Anyone who has any questions about anything environmental feel free to blog. If you know something you don’t think the rest of us are aware of blog it. If you don’t quite believe in global warming yet let us know why. Anyone who has already adapted his or her lifestyle differently to save on anything let us know how, so we might adapt. One idea becomes a ripple that becomes a wave and the whole community benefits.

None of us are perfect angels about the environment. I still drive a gas hog, although I’m looking at all hybrids and beseeching Ford to revive the cobra body style with an electric/ethanol motor. I’m a baby boomer that wants a hybrid sports car. Any baby boomers out there want to weigh in on that? Doesn’t an environmentally friendly sports car sound good? My tip to any other gas hog drivers out there, consolidate your running around. I’m down to 2 days per week. Group up and ride to work together. Quit running your kids around and enjoy family nights. Quitting our rat race can help the environment.