Archive for the ‘Great Lakes’ Category

Michigan House Bills 5127 and 5128 Need to be Stopped

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

There are two bills in the Michigan House right now that should not pass. HB 5127 and 5128 pertaining to FARM ANIMAL WELFARE that fall way short of what we should be doing to help our farm animals. I’ve written many, many blogs about farm animal abuses and the resulting tainted food that is constantly being recalled in the U.S. I’ve also written about a practically nonexistent FDA to oversee our food supply. But the best written piece about the plight of the poor farm animal, the torture it goes through before slaughter and the cesspools we call factory farms is: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/12840743/porks_dirty_
secret_the_nations_top_hog_producer_is_also_one_of_americas_worst
_polluters

Please read this article and know what you are eating and what that poor animal goes through in the process. Once you’ve got a grasp of what big factory farms are all about, remember that the Department of Agriculture has been turning a blind eye to them to for years. At a time when many of us are becoming more and more environmentally conscious, we know that not only preserving small farms but also helping them to flourish once again is key to getting healthier food on our plates while allowing animals a lifestyle they deserve.

In my last blog I quoted Dr. Albert Schweitzer regarding compassion for all living things, that it is the root of all ethics. Well there are far too many people in Michigan’s House of Representatives that just don’t get it. Compassion for living things, including other human beings, is drastically slipping in our so-called “Christian” country. It begins with animals.

House Bill 5127 according to the Humane Society of the U.S., grants the Department of Agriculture sole authority to regulate livestock health and welfare, and require the Department to adopt industry standards regarding the treatment of farm animals. They also preempt local ordinances or regulations regarding animal care standards for farm animals. And HB 5128 establishes an industry dominated animal care advisory council to review and establish animal care standards for farm animals.

What? The very people, the USDA, that have turned a blind eye to the abuse of farm animals relative to factory farms for years are to be in charge? After reading the link above, anyone with a conscious could not possibly allow these bills to pass. What happened in S. Carolina’s factory farms resulted in one of the largest fines for pollution by the EPA ever. It was against Smithfield Foods. The USDA knew about it, but Smithfield Foods has deep pockets. If the pollution from that Smithfield Food’s factory farm in the interior of S. Carolina made it all the way to the ocean, what are factory farms even doing in a place like Michigan surrounded by fresh water? All of us know that groundwater eventually ends up in the lakes, yet there are 2200 factory farms currently in Michigan. Now our legislature wants to water down farm animal rights and regulation by granting the USDA complete control of our farm animal’s welfare?

This is not good for farm animal’s lives, Michigan’s food supply, or our fresh water supplies. It just looks like a way to dump responsibility on an already overburdened federal agency because it’s cheaper and/or easier. Granting the USDA the right to decide what happens to cows, pigs, chickens, turkeys, etc., is like the fox watching the henhouse again. Big corporations will lobby the USDA as they have in the past and end up with control of everything.

Monroe can call Kate Ebli about voting against these bills in the Michigan House at 517-373-2617. Your call can make a big difference to all the farm animals in Michigan, our food and dairy supplies, and our freshwater. We need to start living more compassionate lives. It’s called EMPATHY, the ability to put ourselves in another’s position, right down to animals. There is no reason for cruelty toward something innocent–ever.

$475 Million for the Great Lakes; How Would You Use It?

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

I get email alerts and newsletters from a lot of different groups. One of them is the Great Lakes Townhall meeting notes. The Great Lakes Townhall website is interactive. You can post a response to an editorial there or write your own. Now and then they run polls at Great Lakes Town Hall and this month’s question is:

“President Obama allotted $475 Million for the Great Lakes. If you were in charge, what would be your top priority?”

The responses are:

  • Clean up toxic hot spots
  • Restore coastal wetlands
  • Restoring tributaries to the Great Lakes
  • Improving sewage treatment in major Great Lakes cities
  • Focus on removing invasive species
  • Other…This is where you can comment about how you would spend the money

I was surprised but a big, big majority of people want better sewage treatment. What do they know that we don’t? Check out the website and vote or comment on what you would do for the Great Lakes.

http://greatlakestownhall.org/3340

Michigan May Relinquish Control of Wetlands to Federal Authority

Monday, April 13th, 2009

Michigan is so economically strapped that the governor is considering giving control of our wetlands to the feds, or Army Corps of Engineers. According to an article on the ENS website, “the Michigan Legislature would need to repeal Part 303, Wetlands Protection, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act.”  We must be in trouble in Michigan because this surrender represents a savings of only 2 million dollars but poses a myriad of problems affecting our wetlands. This is a shame since the protection of our wetlands here in Michigan is a model nationwide.

The same article explains: “The state’s Wetlands Program regulates placement of fill, dredging, constructing, operating, or maintaining a use or development in a wetland, and draining surface water from a wetland. ” Thousands of permit applications are processed every year in Michigan that authorize these activities under Section 404 with impacts to inland lakes, streams, and wetlands. Michigan agencies work to get those impacts reduced by 50 to 75%, something a very limited Army Corps of Engineers will be hard pressed to do. But the biggest caveat of all is that a state can’t operate a partial 404 program. This means that it cannot issue permits for some water areas and not others so Michigan would also lose its permitting authority over lakes and streams too.

This is not good for our beautiful water and wetland areas. I say this as I watch a swan swim into a marsh just beyond my backyard. Although my wetlands area is connected to a canal, the Huron River, and ultimately Lake Erie via the Pt. Mouille channel, the wetlands most at risk are those that are isolated and disconnected, some 930,856 acres or 17% of Michigan’s wetlands, although all of Michigan’s wetlands are ultimately at risk.

Along with giving up authority over our wetlands, six other components of the Wetlands Program would be lost also:

· Wetland mapping
· Coastal wetland protection, management and restoration
· Development of scientific methods to monitor the condition of wetlands
· Development of methods to control the highly invasive plants known as phragmites on both public and private property
· Participating in local planning projects to identify potential wetland protection and restoration projects
· Education and outreach, including presentations to civic organizations, school groups, lake associations, watershed councils, local governments and other public groups.

This is a frightening proposition, considering the Feds are not up to this at all. The Army Corp of Engineers will be swamped. So our wetlands, lakes, and streams will be compromised for a mere $2 million? We have citizens with money to build huge sports arenas, develop casinos, and refurbish hotels, but no one can come up with $2 million in lieu of relinquishing our authority to protect our own beautiful water wonderland? There has to be someone out there that can help.

 
Read more about this desperate idea: http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/apr2009/2009-04-06-091.asp
 

 

Michigan is Tilting and Affecting the Great Lakes

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

 

I’m going from notes here and I can’t seem to find this particular show on National Geographic’s website as part of its series Naked Science. So here it goes. It’s long but very interesting especially for Michiganders. On Sunday, April 5th, I viewed a series on Nat Geo about the origin and age of the Great Lakes. The show’s starting point was around 20,000 years ago when the Laurentide Ice Sheet began to melt and retreat. The show culminated with the current assessment that Michigan is tilting.

 

Since Michigan has the greatest telltale signs of this massive ice sheet—the Great Lakes, it was a good place to study its after affects. However, this was not the initial intention of the study. The study was simply trying to date the Great Lakes, but as research continued, the study shifted with new findings and the combination of 2 theories as to how the lakes were formed.

 

The study began with a focus on Niagra Falls where all central U.S. water floods over the edge at 150,000 gpm. This study revealed that the falls are retreating or moving back 1 ft. per year toward Lake Erie. It used to retreat 3-4 ft. just 100 years ago, but the introduction of hydroelectric power slowed that progress. The perpetual destruction of the falls is a giant timepiece. One would think that the weight of the water would harden the surface rock it flows over and it does. It’s called cap rock and is extremely hard, but there is weaker shale behind the cap rock and at the base where it is perpetually pummeled with 70 mph water flow. The base is honed back leaving a cantilever of rock at the top of the falls, which eventually breaks away and lines the river edge below. So Niagra Falls at some point in time will end up in the basin of Lake Erie.

 

The researchers couldn’t carbon date the rock left behind but they could carbon date the clam shells they found from Lake Erie that remained stuck in crevices as the falls regressed. So the further away from the falls, the older the shells with the oldest being 7 miles downriver. Carbon dating these shells puts Niagra Falls at 12,600 years old. Now onto dating the lakes.

 

The Laurentide Ice Sheet covered most of N. America and Canada and was a 1000 times bigger than our largest glacier. When it began to melt and retreat, it carved out Lakes Michigan and Erie first. The bedrock in Mohawk Bay in Lake Erie seems to support this theory. Core samples of sediment there showed that it ground away 1 inch of bedrock every 100 years. Ice streams in glaciers don’t freeze but flow and move 10 times faster than the glacier and grind rock 10 times faster. This fast stream could have carved out the lakes in as short a time as 10,000 years. Core samples coincide with this grinding theory because samples near the top are 1700 years old, the middle 7500 years old, and near the base of the lake are 9,000 years old. The rocks deposited along the shores of Mohawk Bay are both worn smooth by water running over them and jagged as newer hard cut pieces.

 

The early lakes were lifeless, cold, and harsh with a milky appearance that didn’t allow light to penetrate until the bedrock sediment settled. Once clear, the biggest difference in the lakes then and now was that the lakes were disjointed and the floodwaters of the retreating glacier ran south down the Mississippi to the Gulf. Researchers found 14,000 year old freshwater seashells in the Gulf of Mexico. What else could have dumped that much freshwater into the Gulf back then? One more catastrophic event must have happened that joined the lakes and created the 2000-mile long water system—the St. Lawrence Seaway.

 

At the bottom of Lake Ontario is a crater ½ mile wide. None of the other lakes have craters. The theory is that a comet may have caused this crater on first impact. Since comets are actually ice there would be little evidence left behind. But besides this crater, researchers did find grains of iridium along Lake Michigan and black dots of pure carbon compressed so tightly they formed millions of tiny diamonds called impact diamonds.

 

It appears that 12,900 years ago, a comet did strike the Great Lakes area. Wildfires from it quickly broke up the last of the retreating Laurentide glacier. Debris from trees and rocks, giant ice forms, and flood waters from the melting glacier stopped up the flow down the Mississippi backing up the lakes to connect them all and forge the St. Lawrence Seaway as an outlet.

 

Researchers recently found tree trunks still rooted and wood in Lake Huron in 40 ft. of water. The area was never surveyed before. It was a forest of cedar and pine carbon dated as 6,400 to 7,900 years old. Lake Huron was a great degree smaller than Lake Erie, which was believed to be much bigger than now and more turbulent because wild rice was found 5 miles inland from Erie. Rice needs well-oxygenated water to grow. This rice was 4,200 years old. This huge backwash effect caused Lake Huron to swell and swamp that forest and carve out the St. Claire River to Lake Erie. When the seaway was finally carved out, Erie’s shoreline retreated also. But why to the east?

 

Michigan is tilting. Researchers used GPS monitoring to measure whether the shed housing the GPS equipment was rising or falling. They found Michigan tilting higher in the north and lower in the south with the west part of the state rebounding more quickly than the east. Earth’s surface can be compressed and the Laurentide Glacier weighed upwards of 10 million billion tons. It depressed the land around the Great Lake ½ a mile over time. The land is recovering and the rebound is responsible for not only Michigan but also much of N. America to tilt in odd ways. Global warming is accelerating this rebound. The future of the Great Lakes may well be as turbulent as its past.

 

To make it easier to understand how global warming affects the rebound, think of cake batter in a pan in an uneven oven. The dry heat of the oven causes the shallow, less dense batter to rise while the other side—well, it’s just a lopsided cake, and we all know that water will seek the lowest point.

 

A Beaver Along the Detroit River…

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

 

A single beaver lodge was found and photographed along the Detroit River, and suddenly it’s a sign that the river is cleaning up. Detroit River refuge manager for the USFWS said: “Their return signals that a multiyear effort to clean up the river has paid off,” according to an article in the Free Press.

The thing is, a lone beaver was also spotted along a river way in New York, and another in Windsor. Are they clean too? Because Pennsylvania, formerly a cesspool of industry from steel mostly, has a plethora of beavers, some 32,000 in fact.  That amount of beavers didn’t get there overnight. Surely there was plenty of pollution to go around in the 70’s for every state, yet the beavers were in force in Pennsylvania.

And is the fact that the beaver was discovered in an intake canal at Detroit Edison’s Conners Creek power plant an attempt to make the plant look clean too because I think the lone beaver as part of that larger story of ecological recovery in our lakes and rivers is a hoot just like walleye are some sort of gage for clean water. Yeah, I’ve seen that gage before, big tumors on the bigger fish.

Besides Science NetLink website tells us: “Ranchers and watershed managers in the West are employing some of nature’s own engineers for water quality improvement. Beaver-created impoundments (the “lakes” that form upstream of their dams) can be extremely useful in agricultural watersheds. They have been known to retain up to 1,000 times more nitrogen than streams without beaver dams. This has really opened the eyes of some water quality managers to ecosystem services.” So if the beavers are in the immediate area of these watersheds they are evidently NOT adverse to pollution at least not from agricultural sources.

Truth is if we really wanted to see the little critters succeed in re-establishing themselves, we would have reintroduced them long ago like Pennsylvania did way back in 1917 after grotesquely over-trapping them for their fur to extinction in 1912. To assume they haven’t been around Michigan in 75 years because of pollution, and now that one has appeared we’re obviously cleaning up, is a crock.

http://www.freep.com/article/20090216/BUSINESS06/902160355/1019/Business06/Leave+it+to+beaver+to+prove+river+cleaner.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/08/980814070511.htm

http://www.sciencenetlinks.com/lessons.cfm?DocID=275

http://communities.canada.com/windsorstar/blogs/vanderblogger/archive/2008/04/30/wild-beaver-return-to-most-polluted-city-in-north-america.aspx

More Coalburners Possible for Michigan

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009

 

With Michigan’s economy in the dumper and deficits rising, it’s hard for many to stick to a green path in Michigan. Construction of two new coalburners by Wolverine Power Supply and Consumers Energy are planned that will bring work there for a while.

 

But how do we think this will fair alongside new green industry Michigan is looking to entice to our area? We can’t expect green companies to park themselves next to one of the greatest pollution producing industries—coal. It would make for strange neighbors.

 

And what about our health in Michigan? If we expect to horde our water to keep it here, than we have the responsibility to keep that water fresh. Exposing more of our open fresh water to toxic mercury from these plants is unacceptable. Besides that our own health from the air born toxins are in jeopardy. The following is an excerpt from those in Michigan’s medical profession:

As medical doctors conducting health research at Michigan State University and the University of Michigan respectively, we feel compelled to warn that construction of these plants would gravely impair Michigan’s air quality and expose our communities to severe, even lethal, health impacts.

Coal plants release at least 70 different pollutants, including nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, particulate matter and mercury. These pollutants are known carcinogens, teratogens, neurotoxins, and/or cardiopulmonary irritants.

And we wonder why there are so many new cases of autoimmune disease and cancer? This isn’t just about jobs, this is about our health and welfare, which is supported by our environment, the air we breathe, water and food we drink and eat. There are so many more pollutants and toxins in our environment than our ancestors experienced that our bodies are overworked daily. So when we face something as simple as allergies our immune response is flooded. Just yesterday a friend called me to say that another dear friend died of problems arising from his immune system.

 

As Americans we have a tendency to seek instant gratification, only that can sometimes lead to acting without foresight and create more drastic problems down the road. We can’t wait to get jobs in Michigan and are quick to overlook the ramifications of adding more pollution to our state with these coalburners without really, really attempting to facilitate other sources. We gets jobs, get a paycheck for building coal fired power plants, but down the line we suffer grief and lose that income and more to illness. It isn’t worth it.

 

We have a new president on the way with new economic ideas that are environmentally friendly. It looks like this push to start construction on these coalburners is a rush to get by before the new president takes office. And when everyone finds that there are many, many jobs waiting in green industry also, that we have a choice of work, and alternatives for energy, there won’t be much of a long-term future for the archaic fossil fuel industry will there? That’s motive for the fossil fuel energy companies that isn’t in the best interest of the people in this state. The more we manage to forge ahead into green technology, the greater the strides we will make toward some pretty remarkable energy sources that won’t infringe on the environment and ultimately on our own well being.

 

Contact Governor Granholm that you want a stay on these permits for now: http://www.michigan.gov/gov/0,1607,7-168-21995—,00.html

 

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009901070332

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009901070345

 

View Great Lake Hotspots Due for Cleanup

Monday, September 29th, 2008

 

The Great Lakes are getting attention again with the Great Lakes Compact and the latest addition of $54 million per year for two years to the Great Lakes Legacy Act. There are 42 Areas of Concern that are toxic hotspots relative to the Great Lakes Legacy Act, and another 93 that are on the Superfund list as a national priority. That’s a lot of toxic spots.

 

I thought it would be interesting to find the 42 hotspots and found a Google map of at least 31 of them. I clicked on quite a few for more information.  There is an awful lot of work to be done. I don’t think the $54 million will make a dent and well, it’s going to take quite a long time. I know when they were cleaning up the Black Lagoon in the Trenton Channel it took most of the summer. Then there is the problem of where to dump the toxic stuff. Of course the Black Lagoon stuff ended up near my house. http://www.blogsmonroe.com/world/?p=21.

I wasn’t too happy about it.

 

Check out the Google Map of hotspots: http://www.healthylakes.org/areas_of_concern/2008/06/24/unearthing-the-great-lakes-areas-of-concern.

 

 

 

 

DTE’s Latest Award

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008

 

The Clean Corporate Citizen (C3) program, established under Administrative Rules R324.1501 to R324.1511, allows regulated establishments that have demonstrated environmental stewardship and a strong environmental ethic through their operations in Michigan to be recognized as Clean Corporate Citizens. The C3 program is built on the concept that these Michigan facilities can be relied upon to carry out their environmental protection responsibilities without rigorous oversight, and should enjoy greater permitting flexibility than those that have not demonstrated that level of environmental awareness. Clean Corporate Citizens who voluntarily participate in this program will receive public recognition and are entitled to certain regulatory benefits, including expedited permits. http://www.michigan.gov/deq/0,1607,7-135-3307_3666_4134—,00.html

 

While I’m happy that DTE is looking into investing in environmentally sound alternatives in the future, and this attempt to clean up AROUND Monroe’s coalburner is great progress, the Clean Corporate Citizen’s award is a little out of place here. What about the mercury? What about the CO2? Has DTE turned our coalburner into a carbon capture plant, because unless all three things are addressed with this award, than clean is a subjective word?

 

The award comes from Michigan’s DEQ whose budget has recently been slashed again. http://www.blogsmonroe.com/world/?p=414. The same DEQ that warns they will have fewer regulators looking out for Michigan’s wetlands, rivers, and streams, and will not likely to be able to respond to pollution spills.

 

If you read about the Clean Corporate Citizen program above it says, “regulated establishments that had a strong environmental ethic THROUGH their operations in Michigan…”  Come on, DTE just recently installed scrubbers that DO NOT address CO2 and or the resultant mercury emissions. It’s the second largest burner in the country.

 

I especially like the part above that says: “should enjoy greater permitting flexibility than those that have not demonstrated that level of environmental awareness.”  DTE is now a Clean Corporate Citizen who can enjoy EXPEDITED permits says the Dept. of Environmental Quality that no longer has the funds to regulate what happens to much of our state’s surface waters. The same surface waters of which 25% do not fall under the Great Lakes Compact protection either, thanks to Michigan’s senate.

 

Lovely.

 

 

DEQ Won’t Be Checking on Wetlands or Pollution Spills Due to Cuts

Wednesday, September 17th, 2008

 

Does anyone else find it fishy that Michigan’s Senate Republicans fought to keep 25% of surface groundwater such as wetlands out of the Great Lakes Compact, and specifically out of the public’s domain, and now Michigan’s DEQ says it must slash its wetland inspection, and pollution spill response programs? The DEQ says many will be on the honor system when it comes to withdrawing water and dumping pollution. Great. Here we go with self regulation again, that’s not working out well in other sectors of the economy right now. 

 

So no one will be around if you complain that the guy behind you is filling in that nice little creek between both your houses, or that nice piece of land next to you in the boonies up north becomes a dump site of sorts, not to mention siphoning rivers like the Au Sable, and making some wetlands literally dry up.

 

So many cuts have been made to help Michigan’s economy along. Didn’t the senate anticipate little to no regulators being able to keep watch on our wetlands in the very near future?  It’s only been months since that compact was signed and already surface water is threatened, and not just the 25% the senate fought to keep out of the compact. Hmmm.

 

The only good thing is that Gov. Granholm also signed bills to manage the use of surface ground water via a computer system that will determine when and where business can make withdrawals. The problem is this computer system is so new. Just how many places have monitors installed? Probably very few. Where will the money to monitor come from since the DEQ is fresh out of money?

 

And here’s the kicker. Obama wants to contribute $5 million dollars to really, really clean up the Great Lakes. The way things stand now, our service water is out of the loop of protection as part of our Great Lakes. Unless it’s included in the future, there will be no clean Great Lakes. Pollutants from groundwater will make it into the lakes. And unchecked withdrawals of surface water will likely take place to the point some wetlands may disappear.

 

The decision to keep surface water out of public domain caters completely to industry and special interest groups. Now it’s all come back to kick us in the pants when we find we’ve lost our say in our own backyards for 25% of surface water  problems, and nobody will come if you call about the other 75% either.

 

http://www.mlive.com/news/kzgazette/index.ssf?/base/news-30/1221576618242910.xml&coll=7

 

http://greatlakesgreatmichigan.org/legislation.htm

 

 

 

New Safety Guidelines for Eating Fish from Michigan

Wednesday, August 6th, 2008

WXYZ posted new safety guidelines for eating fish caught in Michigan. I knew that no one is supposed to eat catfish or carp from in or around the Detroit River, but I didn’t know that all other fish was to be limited to one meal per MONTH? That’s been a rule for 20 years.

The new rules state that kids under 15 or child bearing women should never eat any small mouth bass or walleye over 18 inches. And do not eat carp, catfish, or white bass from the Saginaw Bay and River and Tittabawassee River.

 

I went to the Fish Advisory website at michigan.gov and read about how lake fish should be cooked:

 

Cut off all the fat.

Remove or poke holes in the fish’s skin before cooking. This will help the fat and chemicals to drain off the fish.

Bake, broil, or grill the fish on a rack. Throw away the drippings.

Do not eat the guts, head, skin, bones, or dark fatty areas.

Do not re-use the oil that was used to deep or pan fry the fish.

 

Sorry, but these directions remind me of a label on a bottle of pesticide where it says to use gloves, do not get on skin, in eyes, or mouth, wash everything thoroughly, do not use sprayer for anything else, etc.

The most important thing I did read was: Mercury stays in the filet of the fish and cannot be cut or cooked away. Use the MDCH guides to choose fish that are low in mercury.

After reading this all I could think of is my husband’s friend, an avid fisherman, who tossed mercury off as something that can just be cut away. I didn’t think so, but you can’t talk to a fisherman. This one happens to be single, so at least he’s not taking it home to the kids.

 

http://www.wxyz.com/alnews/local/story.aspx?content_id=7d15f21b-a073-4604-afc5-4d09431d1952

http://www.michigan.gov/documents/FishAdvisory03_67354_7.pdf