Posts Tagged ‘Obama Administration’

President Obama Raises Issue of Permafrost Melt in Russia Relative to Global Warming

Monday, July 6th, 2009

President Obama’s current trip to Russia was mainly about both countries being role models for the rest of the world concerning a reduction in nuclear arms and cooperation on climate change. President Obama voiced concern over Russia’s permafrost region in Siberia. He warned, “If the permafrost in Russia completely melts, it could completely transform the weather patterns on the planet, in some cases in very dangerous ways,” according to ENS website and many others.

Environmental News Service had an article back in 2006 regarding the permafrost melt in Russia. It seems the melting permafrost is releasing ten times the methane than originally thought. The article stated, “The research team recorded the bubbling of methane at two thawing lakes in northern Siberia using aerial surveys, remote sensors and year-round measurements. The scientists found the expansion of the lakes between 1974 and 2000, fueled by a period of regional warming, increased methane emissions by 58 percent.”

The amazing thing is that the methane gas in this permafrost dates back to the Pleistocene age—”some 40 thousand years ago, according to study coauthor Jeff Chanton, a scientist with Florida State University.” The article went on to say: “More than 4 million tons of methane is being released by Siberia’s array of lakes and wetlands, the researchers said, a figure that is 10 to 63 percent higher than previous estimates.” Another study released in 2006 by the British Antarctic Survey, “found that in the past 800,000 years methane had never tipped 750 parts per billion (ppb), but [was] 1,780 ppb [already back in 2006].”

To exacerbate the problem of melting permafrost is that much of the freshwater is diluting the ocean’s saltwater content also. The NOAA Status Report: “NOAA’s Arctic Goals for IPY (International Polar Year) & Beyond” states that possible Arctic influences on global climate change include:

Increase in methane in the atmosphere due to a thaw in the permafrost on land and under water

Fresh water/salt water imbalances. Ocean circulation disruption

Changing albedo of the planet due to melting of sea ice and taller vegetation (ALBEDO refers to ratio of reflected light and incident light)

Extinction or migration of many species

Rising sea level due to Greenland’s melting ice sheet

Increase in severe weather

The NOAA also stated: “Atmospheric influences on the total system are profound.”

Read more:
2009 ENS article: http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jul2009/2009-07-06-01.asp.
2006 ENS article: http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/sep2006/2006-09-07-01.asp.
NOAA’s report: www.oco.noaa.gov/meetings/OCOSR/…/9_presentation_Calder.ppt.

Obama Announces Task Force for Green Jobs for the Middle Class

Friday, January 30th, 2009

President Obama just announced he will have a task force lead by VP Joe Biden that will focus on green jobs for the middle class. Biden presented this website where the public can get information http://www.astrongmiddleclass.gov. The task force will be in the form of monthly meetings the first to be held is in Philadelphia on Feb. 27.

According to MSNBC, Biden said the jobs “pay well, can’t be outsourced and will help us move to a cleaner, more self-sufficient energy future.” Sounds good. Get moving.

The areas of green job expansion coincide with Obama’s stimulus package. The article stated that “utilities could enlist workers to build a more powerful and efficient energy grid, and developers could build more energy efficient homes, offices and schools by weatherizing them or building new structures to green codes.” The auto industry is expected to retool itself also.

Funny but I could swear I caught Republicans complaining about unnecessary spending in Obama’s stimulus package while referring to money for infrastructure projects, updating schools, and our parks. If updating power grids, schools, bridges, and helping our parks that have been sold to the devil by the past administration is pork barrel, than what was funding for the bridge and road to nowhere?

The article went on to say that “some Republican lawmakers have backed the focus on green jobs, but others question whether the government should be trying to direct the economy.” What? How about handing Wall St. billions without any oversight, and repeating that action, while singling out American automakers by threatening a Czar that would tell the auto companies how to operate? Wouldn’t the government then be directing an entire major manufacturing sector of our economy?

The operative word here is “self righteous” relative to partisanship.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28934164/wid=18298287.

 

 

 

 

 

Obama’s Environmental Cabinet

Wednesday, January 21st, 2009

 

 

The Grist website offered a good introduction as to who’s who in the Obama administration that’s going to be watching over all things environmental.

 

The lineup looks good, although I worry a little about the agricultural industry and hopes for eliminating CAFO’s.  But time will tell. We’ll see the direction this administration takes soon by the rulings President Obama overturns his first few weeks in office. Hopefully the animals in peril from being delisted from the Endangered Species List will soon be reinstated, and their habitat protected.

 

I’ve signed quite a few environmental petitions for various things aimed at the White House ASAP. Many, many people do want change. Right now I’d like to see change in my heating bill! Not enough sun this winter to help out.

 

http://grist.org/feature/2008/11/13/index.html